1. Having trouble logging in to the new RPLS Community website?

    Welcome to the new RPLS Community website. SurveyorConnect may be gone but the community is still here and going strong!

    Due to the new website URL, you may have to login to your account again. It's the same login as you had before, but your browser likely won't recognize it, even if you set it to remember you. If you can't get logged in, you can reset your password. Be sure to check your spam or junk folder if you don't receive the confirmation message right away. If you still have trouble, send us an email at support@rplstoday.com.

    [ CLICK HERE TO RESET YOUR PASSWORD ]

    Dismiss Notice

Why don't we have a gps type satellite on the moon?

Discussion in 'Surveying & Geomatics' started by Nate The Surveyor, Apr 21, 2017.

  1. Nate The Surveyor

    Nate The Surveyor 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    2,409
    Location:
    SW Arkansas
    Licensed in:
    AR
    I was thinking putting three satellites on the moon would give you a small triangle and would give you some interesting information from a GPS point of view. It could augment our GPS system. And being on the moon, could provide 3 units, mounted together.
    I'm just bringing it up.
    Why, or why not?
    N
     
    Brad Ott likes this.
  2. Robert Hill

    Robert Hill 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,846
    Likes Received:
    851
    Location:
    St. Tammany Parish, LA
  3. Mark Mayer

    Mark Mayer 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2010
    Messages:
    4,616
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Licensed in:
    OK, OR, WA
    Probably a cost/benefit thing. Soft landing a unit on the moon would cost a lot more than orbiting one. In fact I'd guess it would cost more than orbiting a few dozen of them.
     
    aliquot and Dan Patterson like this.
  4. Dan Patterson

    Dan Patterson 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    344
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Licensed in:
    NJ
    Also, I'm thinking your triangle would be incredibly small compared to the distance from the earth to the moon. Those three would essentially be the same as having just one given their relative proximity to each other vs the distance they are measuring.
     
  5. Bill93

    Bill93 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    4,021
    Likes Received:
    932
    Location:
    52402
    The moon is on average 19 times the distance of the GPS satellite orbits.

    So you have
    -high cost of delivery and soft landing on moon
    -weak signal unless you build it with high power transmitters (and big solar array, hard to deploy on landing)
    -much more complicated calculations for position, involving moon's orbit and libration
    to gain
    -Little more benefit than one more satellite, because of the small angle between any number on moon. You might gain in resolving ambiguities, but not much in DOP.
     
    gschrock and Brad Ott like this.
  6. gschrock

    gschrock 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2010
    Messages:
    2,555
    Likes Received:
    909
    Location:
    The Nice Washington
    The moon is a bit too wobbly. "Fixed" points on the moon are not quite as "fixed" as would be optimal for any kind of ranging methods. Even with antennas spread around the edge of the visible side are not going to provide very good geometry, and would have to have their positions tracked as well if not better than the exiting orbiting sats. But as an augmentation to existing constellations? Have heard some pretty compelling ideas floated at past conferences (but no serious papers as yet). Now putting a persistent source of RF in very distant orbits (like out in the belt) could provide a very precise alignment augmentation (like VLBI). Existing VLBI sources (e.g. distant quasars) are too weak for small portable dish solutions to work.
    Then there are things like gravitational "lens" effects around bodies like the moon that might boost distant sources. Still kind of a stretch.
    But all that geekage aside.... I am sure that if/when there are developments on the moon and Mars that laterally provide persistent sources of RF, then some folks will figure out how to augment positioning and navigation using them... watch for a Kickstarter for the GavNav 2060... :D
     
  7. clearcut

    clearcut 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2010
    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    99
    Seems to be the type of question pondered up after partaking in a communal peace pipe with the local hill-billies.
     
  8. R.J. Schneider

    R.J. Schneider 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2010
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    249
    Location:
    Houston, Tx.
    Somehow this whole thing led to Youtubing Claire Torry in Pink Floyd's Great Gig in the Sky

     
    rochs01, Robert Hill and Brad Ott like this.
  9. James Fleming

    James Fleming 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    3,908
    Likes Received:
    1,995
    Location:
    Along the Mason-Dixon Line
    Licensed in:
    DE, MD, PA
    Two words....moon people

     
    Brad Ott, rochs01 and gschrock like this.
  10. hlbennettpls

    hlbennettpls 1-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2015
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    70
    Licensed in:
    FL
  11. Robert Hill

    Robert Hill 6-Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,846
    Likes Received:
    851
    Location:
    St. Tammany Parish, LA
     
    Brad Ott likes this.
  12. spledeus

    spledeus 5-Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    2,440
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    Chatham, MA
    My brother asked me something similar a year ago. It was more along the line of obtaining better elevations probably thought of from the Big Bang episode where the geeks blasted a laser at a target on the moon and determined an expected distance.

    I would prefer an array of photo satellites to see the whole moon at once. Same with mars and all the other planets. This originates from the Martian and the gaps in visibility from the lack of satellites. Does not help us until we really start mapping.
     
  13. Chris Bouffard

    Chris Bouffard Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2016
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    36
    Licensed in:
    NJ
    How about orbit, rotation and the revolving Earth? Not to mention that the moon is not on an equidistant orbit.
     

Share This Page