Save 15% on PE & SE Review Materials

Community Forums

When do you let it ride  

Page 1 / 2 Next
  RSS

Williwaw
(@williwaw)
1,000+ posts Registered
Joined:5 years  ago
Posts: 1963
May 17, 2017 8:49 am  

Twice in the last week I've done work in separate subdivisions and run in to 'complications'. The first one done by a surveyor I know and respect, every curve return I recovered appeared to be off by 8-9' and I can only assume that he used a 30' radius in laying out their positions when the plat calls for 40'. Since I know him well ( use to work for him years ago) I felt comfortable giving him a head's up and sending him my data. Better he hears it from me than someone with an axe to grind.

The second incident involved a recently recorded subdivision done by an out of town surveyor I'm not familiar with. Long story short I ended up having to scale all of his plat dimensions by 0.9983 to get anything to remotely fit and even then it was a bit sloppy. All of these corners fell under canopy (fairly dense spruce) and I could see no evidence of any cut lines or control points anywhere and surmise it was done with RTK and my guess is his grid to ground was double scaled, inversely. That and some bogus curve data made it a rather 'fun' job.

So you run into things like this, it happens. I hesitate to give the second surveyor a friendly 'heads up' call. Seems the right thing to do, however I have no skin in the game other than accomplishing the mission I was originally tasked with.

What sayeth you?

Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.


ReplyQuote
holy cow
(@holy-cow)
10,000+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 14352
May 17, 2017 8:56 am  

Might be an opportunity to make a new friend in the business. Approach the situation in such a way to indicate you are questioning your own abilities in matching his work because of this apparent difference. Mention the variety of things you have double checked already. Then, maybe, just maybe, you invite him to meet you to double check a few points with you. He should start to notice why you can't agree with what's on the plat because he can't do it either, now.


ReplyQuote
Daniel Ralph
(@daniel-ralph)
250+ posts Registered
Joined:4 years  ago
Posts: 447
May 17, 2017 9:19 am  

Down here we are required to file a record of survey map in both cases where I explain the situation that I found and my reasoning for the outcome that I decide. These maps get forwarded to my peer and I wait for a phone call or reply of some sort. We have 90 days to file these maps which gives the original surveyor time to respond. If they don't, you have put the public on notice and helped the next guy out. If they don't reply, it is a violation that your board may want to know about. Friendly or not.
You are fortunate that both surveyors are still around albeit one out of town. Which can be a long way in AK.

Dan Moehrke, PLS


ReplyQuote
FrozenNorth
(@frozennorth)
250+ posts Registered
Joined:3 years  ago
Posts: 320
May 17, 2017 9:23 am  

Easy for me to say since I'm not involved, but I'd recommend giving the second surveyor a friendly heads-up. I get your reluctance, as it sounds like he just plain didn't do a professional job (RTK only, messed up scale factors, no control, bad curves, oy!), so it's not likely that he'll want to now...but on the other hand, maybe he put too much faith in an employee, or was early in the learning curve of GPS and would love the chance to fix his own mistake.


ReplyQuote
Nate The Surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
5,000+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 8016
May 17, 2017 9:30 am  

Another thing... If you contact him, get info from him as to where he set his base.
This would allow you to 100% match his data... If he used an autonamous base, and geodetic north, but blew the csf... Now you and he could get on the identical data... It's the goal of retracement.
Just a brg and dist from a point on his survey would do it.

Surveying is more than a Job----it is a passion to provide a foundation for future generation, that is beyond reproach.

Nate


ReplyQuote
Nate The Surveyor
(@nate-the-surveyor)
5,000+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 8016
May 17, 2017 9:37 am  

It would "match his data.." ie, what he meant to do...

Surveying is more than a Job----it is a passion to provide a foundation for future generation, that is beyond reproach.

Nate


ReplyQuote
thebionicman
(@thebionicman)
1,000+ posts Registered
Joined:4 years  ago
Posts: 2469
May 17, 2017 9:39 am  

Unless we run into bad stuff from the same guy over and over I start with a call. Most things are framed as a 'difference' to start the conversation. It may be his crew chief had liquid lunch that day and the problem isnt evident yet. Might even be I screwed up.
Start easy and progress as needed. Take it as far as you have to in order to clean it up.

CFedS, PLS ID-OR-WA-UT-NV


ReplyQuote
Williwaw
(@williwaw)
1,000+ posts Registered
Joined:5 years  ago
Posts: 1963
May 17, 2017 10:05 am  

Nate The Surveyor, post: 428741, member: 291 wrote: It would "match his data.." ie, what he meant to do...

Oh, I matched his data alright. Had to warp things pretty good to get there though. I'm just going to email him and let him know what I found and it's up to him since it's his stamp on it and not mine. If something with my name on it wound up being all goobered up, I'd sure want to know about it before it became an issue for someone. I'll just call it a friendly 'heads up' and leave it at that. Easier to just let it ride, but not the right thing to do IMHO.

Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get me.


ReplyQuote
Anonymous
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Guest
Joined:48 years  ago
Posts: 0
May 17, 2017 10:36 am  

Holy Cow, post: 428734, member: 50 wrote: Might be an opportunity to make a new friend in the business. Approach the situation in such a way to indicate you are questioning your own abilities in matching his work because of this apparent difference. Mention the variety of things you have double checked already. Then, maybe, just maybe, you invite him to meet you to double check a few points with you. He should start to notice why you can't agree with what's on the plat because he can't do it either, now.

Since there isn't a 'dislike' button, l'll
reply. I really don't like the suggestion to try some ploy to get the surveyor on notice.
By being a professional, one would be factual and up front with them with respect to the profession.
The old Golden Rule applies too.


ReplyQuote
thebionicman
(@thebionicman)
1,000+ posts Registered
Joined:4 years  ago
Posts: 2469
May 17, 2017 11:06 am  

Robert Hill, post: 428752, member: 378 wrote: Since there isn't a 'dislike' button, l'll
reply. I really don't like the suggestion to try some ploy to get the surveyor on notice.
By being a professional, one would be factual and up front with them with respect to the profession.
The old Golden Rule applies too.

I dont think he is advocating a lie. My read (and opinion) is that a touch of humility will go a long way.

CFedS, PLS ID-OR-WA-UT-NV


ReplyQuote
holy cow
(@holy-cow)
10,000+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 14352
May 17, 2017 11:45 am  

Sure, I like to assume that what I'm doing is absolutely correct in every way. I would like to think the other guy operates on the same assumption about his work. If he was calling me, I would hope he would do as I suggested above and indicate that he can't get his numbers to match mine and suggest getting together to figure out what is going on. If he calls me up and tells me I must be some sort of Neanderthal with my head up my rear, I'm not going to think very highly of him. It's just as likely that he is the one making the mistake, not me. If we can cooperate to find out where the error lies, things will be better for everyone. There is no lying involved. I might be wrong. He might be wrong. We simply don't know which one is wrong.

It's mighty awkward calling someone up and informing them of the fact they made an error. I have made errors in the past and probably will do so again. I want to be absolutely certain it is an error before I give them a reason to view me as some arrogant ass who must push himself up by pushing others down.


ReplyQuote
eapls2708
(@eapls2708)
1,000+ posts Registered
Joined:7 years  ago
Posts: 1702
May 17, 2017 12:38 pm  

Robert Hill, post: 428752, member: 378 wrote: Since there isn't a 'dislike' button, l'll
reply. I really don't like the suggestion to try some ploy to get the surveyor on notice.
By being a professional, one would be factual and up front with them with respect to the profession.
The old Golden Rule applies too.

I don't see it as some sort of subterfuge. Most people, especially surveyors will be less likely to be cooperative if they get a call out of the blue from someone they don't know telling them how they [email protected](%*d up a job. And, if it turns out that you overlooked something and made the same mistake each of the 3 or 4 times you checked your own work, even if it's minor compared to the mistakes made by the other guy, you end up looking like a turd for criticizing his work when yours may be less than perfect. That can happen to the best of us.

Even if you were very careful with your checks, you're certain your work is correct, and indeed, it is correct, approaching the matter as if there is at least the possibility that there might be something you overlooked while not hiding the fact that you are pretty sure as you've checked and rechecked before calling, you don't come off as an egotistical prick calling to point out someone else's faults while holding your own work up as the model of technical perfection.

The point is to keep it friendly yet professional, letting them know you think that there is a problem in their fieldwork while leaving open the possibility that since you're human, there could also be a mistake in yours contributing to the discrepancy.

Evan A. Page, PLS


ReplyQuote
Anonymous
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Guest
Joined:48 years  ago
Posts: 0
May 17, 2017 1:20 pm  

Holy Cow, post: 428759, member: 50 wrote: Sure, I like to assume that what I'm doing is absolutely correct in every way. I would like to think the other guy operates on the same assumption about his work. If he was calling me, I would hope he would do as I suggested above and indicate that he can't get his numbers to match mine and suggest getting together to figure out what is going on. If he calls me up and tells me I must be some sort of Neanderthal with my head up my rear, I'm not going to think very highly of him. It's just as likely that he is the one making the mistake, not me. If we can cooperate to find out where the error lies, things will be better for everyone. There is no lying involved. I might be wrong. He might be wrong. We simply don't know which one is wrong.

It's mighty awkward calling someone up and informing them of the fact they made an error. I have made errors in the past and probably will do so again. I want to be absolutely certain it is an error before I give them a reason to view me as some arrogant ass who must push himself up by pushing others down.

Good reply
I was simply struck by the notion that if you called me and weren't upfront about the reason that you were calling that somehow my intuition would kick in and wonder why you were being coy about the situation. But maybe that just me.
Just feel it is better to be straight up.


ReplyQuote
A Harris
(@a-harris)
5,000+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 6662
May 17, 2017 9:19 pm  

I always welcome a call from another surveyor.
A group of professionals that has the time to communicate with one another by some means is healthy for the profession and the individual people involved.
To open the line of conversation and have a meeting of minds is never a wasted of time.
The events that waste our time are the ones that get dismissed and left unattended by not making contact with the very person you have questions for.
Whether any good comes from your efforts can not be guaranteed, the success is in sharing your findings with another surveyor.

RPLS NE Texas
d[-_-]b


ReplyQuote
NorthernSurveyor
(@northernsurveyor)
250+ posts Registered
Joined:8 years  ago
Posts: 428
May 17, 2017 10:03 pm  

Williwaw, post: 428748, member: 7066 wrote: Oh, I matched his data alright. Had to warp things pretty good to get there though. I'm just going to email him and let him know what I found and it's up to him since it's his stamp on it and not mine. If something with my name on it wound up being all goobered up, I'd sure want to know about it before it became an issue for someone. I'll just call it a friendly 'heads up' and leave it at that. Easier to just let it ride, but not the right thing to do IMHO.

Williwaw, read the statutory requirements for a record of survey in Alaska. If you find substantial differences from record you need to file a ROS.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, have been doing the impossible, for the ungrateful. We have been doing so much, with so little, for so long, that we are now qualified to do anything with nothing."


ReplyQuote
Page 1 / 2 Next
  
Working

Please Login or Register

Javad GNSS