Javad Triumph-2 or Triumph-1M
Looking to get a Triumph LS Base/Rover combo.
Which base would you recommend and why.
The Triumph-2 is listed as a "GIS field mapping receiver", I would go with the Triumph-1M.
Right now that is a fairly simple to answer.
Do you want to use Gallileo or Compass? If so, T1M.
Do you want an internal radio? If so, T1M
Do you want a cheaper, and smaller form factor? If so T2.
Can you wait 30-60 days? If so T3 is rumored to be out. Specs supposed to be similar to T1M, in a chopped LS form factor. (not clear on internal radio though)
Hop over the Javad forum. Lots of answers over there.
I would recommend the Triumph-1M over Triumph-2 for a base. Like Adam I use the Triumph-2 as a base and it works very well. I like the internal radio of the Triumph-1M, which the Triumph-2 does not have (requiring an external radio). The Triumph-1M also is capable of tracking Galileo and Beidou, which the Triumph-2 is not.
The internal radio allows you to have a simple setup for small sites. An external radio can be added for larger sites. An external radio can also be configured as a repeater to extend the range even further.
The main advantage of the Triumph-2 over the Triumph-1M is cost. Both work well, but the Triumph-1M has additional flexibility.
Thanks for the replies.
I've been going through the Javad forum.
Some say the addition of Galileo will not improve performance and others claim its a game changer.