# Community Forums

How big is the Big ...

Share:

# How big is the Big Fill?

Page 1 / 4
Posts: 294
Member
(@rplumb314)
250+ posts
Joined: 8 years ago

On the original alignment of the Transcontinental Railroad, about 4 miles NE of Promontory UT where the "golden spike" ceremony was held, there is a massive piece of earthwork known as the Big Fill. It is still clearly visible on aerial images at lat. 41.64115, lon. -112.47921.

The Big Fill was built in early 1869 by the Central Pacific. It took three months' work by 500 men with shovels and 250 horse-drawn carts.

Stephen Ambrose, in his excellent book about the Transcontinental Railroad, "Nothing Like It On Earth," gives the volume of the Big Fill as 10,000 cu. yd. The National Park Service, which operates the Golden Spike National Monument, uses the same figure. That yardage, according to Ambrose, was a pre-construction eyeball estimate by Leland Stanford, the president of the CP.

I got curious about the fill volume while looking at the aerial and thinking about Stanford's background. He was neither a surveyor nor an engineer. He began his career as a lawyer, and then was a wholesale grocer and a politician before going into the railroad business.

It turned out to be possible to make a rough check of the Big Fill's volume by scaling offsets from the centerline to the toe of slope on the aerial, making assumptions about the slope ratio, and synthesizing some cross sections. Here's a plan view--

Here's an example of how the sections were constructed--

This .pdf gives a larger plan view--

I ran the calc with an assumed 1.5:1 slope and again with a 1:1 slope. I had no centerline profile, contours, or any other elevation data, so the height of the embankment was backed in from the slopes and the toe offsets as shown above. The elevations all remain unknown. But the areas of the fill sections should be reasonably accurate if the slope ratio is correct.

The 1.5:1 slope calc gives a fill volume of about 70,000 cu. yd. The 1:1 slope calc gives a fill volume of about 108,000 cu. yd.

The 1:1 slope, or something close to that, seems more likely. Both the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific built their lines as fast as they could, planning to upgrade them later as necessary. They were being paid by the mile. And backing in the 1:1 slope gives a maximum centerline fill of about 70 feet, which agrees with a figure given by the NPS, source unknown.

Of course a calc of this kind is not as accurate as a field survey, but it gives an order of magnitude. If anyone wanted to check it in the field, the embankment doesn't seem to have suffered much erosion in the past 150 years.

I would be interested in any information that others might have about the Big Fill.

28 Replies
Posts: 3839
Member
(@flga-pls-2-2)
2,500+ posts
Joined: 9 years ago

Since you are a Stephen Ambrose fan have you read "Undaunted Courage"? If not, I think you would really enjoy it. I have read it twice, once by itself and the second time I read it I read the journals along with the book. There is quite a bit more information if you read their journal as you follow in the book.

I have also read "Nothing Like It in the World" and thought it was good but it had a little too much superfluous business information about the UP and the CP.

Member
(@rplumb314)
Joined: 8 years ago

250+ posts
Posts: 294

@flga-pls-2-2

I haven't read "Undaunted Courage," but will check it out. Thanks for the recommendation.

It stands to reason that the journals would be of interest, and would contain background information that didn't fit neatly into the narrative. It's much the same with original PLSS notes.

Posts: 5610
Member
(@bill93)
5,000+ posts
Joined: 9 years ago

The Ambrose book seems to me to paint a good overall picture of the Transcontinental project and politics, but if you google you can find a list of errors in the specifics that is almost shameful for someone of his background as a historian and professor.

We were at the Golden Spike site on our recent trip, but didn't take the side trip to the big fill. Now I regret that.

Posts: 3839
Member
(@flga-pls-2-2)
2,500+ posts
Joined: 9 years ago
Posted by: @bill93

but if you google you can find a list of errors in the specifics that is almost shameful for someone of his background as a historian and professor.

I've seen all sorts of stuff about Ambrose and his errors and agree with you. I look at his writings as "semi historical fiction", which paints the picture, or, in my case creates the movie in my mind. Once that's in place additional "boring" true historical facts can be ascertained through other means such as the Journal of L&C to substantiate/clearify errors. 😎

2 Replies
Member
(@jamesf1)
Joined: 9 years ago

250+ posts
Posts: 260

@flga-pls-2-2

Aren't all writings "semi-historical fiction"?

Member
(@flga-pls-2-2)
Joined: 9 years ago

2,500+ posts
Posts: 3839

@jamesf1

Beats me, I just made up the word.  😎

Posts: 96
Member
(@rover83)
50+ posts
Joined: 4 years ago

I like Ambrose's writing style - usually approachable enough that even someone who is not especially into history can enjoy his books. But the number of errors revealed in his books are incredible for someone who has the resources and clout to thoroughly fact-check content. As a defense, he actually made a statement to the effect that he is just telling stories in his writings...it was hard for me to take him seriously after that.

I much prefer David McCullough for American history, even though his writing is denser. The Path Between the Seas (an entire history of the Panama Canal project) has some amazing surveying accounts, not to mention engineering marvels, and The Great Bridge is almost as good for a history of engineering feats.

2 Replies
Member
(@flga-pls-2-2)
Joined: 9 years ago

2,500+ posts
Posts: 3839

@rover83

"The Path Between the Seas"  Just looked at this on the nook site and bought it. \$16 bucks for a ebook! Cripes. Looks like it will be worth it, thanks for the heads up. 😎

Member
(@rover83)
Joined: 4 years ago

50+ posts
Posts: 96

@flga-pls-2-2

You're welcome - I certainly found it worthwhile, but then again my first degree was in history.

I knew a bit about the U.S. era before reading it, but the French period was incredible to me. I had no idea how much it had blown up politics in France, or how so many of the citizens got hammered (and bankrupted) by the company's failure.

Of course, the best part was reading about the original exploratory surveys - including a level run across the entire isthmus to ensure that if the cut was made the Atlantic wouldn't drain all of its water into the Pacific, because no one was quite sure if the seas were at the same level...

Page 1 / 4
Default