Blanket Easement Court Decisions
Hi everyone. First time posting here I think. I am a PLS in Arkansas, 19 years in the profession, 4 years licensed. Long story short, the local power company recently installed two guy anchors on my personal property (leaving 150′ of ruts and a hammer that my mower didn’t like very much). I have found a blanket easement to said power company from 1984 giving right to “construct, operate, and maintain” lines on the property. The interesting twist is that the pole in question is on the neighboring property. The only pole on my property is near the southwest corner, with the pole in question being about 300′ east (property is 1.2 Ac, approx 120’x430′ W/E). The overhead line crosses my property near the south line for about 100′ before exiting as it runs to the pole in question. Said pole is 15′ south of my line, and per the previous owners testimony, there hasn’t been a guy wire to that pole on my property since 1991. So my question now is how far do blanket easement rights go? My understanding is that it gives the grantee, (I will only be speaking of utility companies, not any other easement rights), the right to lay and maintain the line as it was constructed, and not to expand the area of use or completely reroute the line. This is a bit of a gray area. It is an existing line which they aren’t moving (simply maintaining), yet they are assuming to install new guys that have not been necessary for 30 years. The line is generally straight, running W/E. I spoke with a lineman in the area who supposed that the reasoning was to tighten up the line a bit. Yet tightening the existing guys on the other side of the fence should have sufficed without needing to install two more anchors, one of which isn’t even being used. What I am looking for now is legal precedent or court cases, specifically in Arkansas, which define the extent to which a blanket easement without description conveys rights to utility companies. I am hoping to be able to get them to remove the lines and if I can’t, to at least force them to define the easement specifically and revoke any future blanket rights to the property. If anyone can point me in the right direction, I would appreciate it!
-Justin
Log in to reply.